Monday, September 11, 2006

Lawsuits, Movies, and More

Two of the most important election lawsuits are going forward this week. Holder v McPherson (.pdf) is the statewide action brought by challenging the certification of Diebold. The update:

The hearing for the Motion for Preliminary Injunction for the California Diebold Case (Holder v. McPherson) will be held next Thursday, September 14th at 9:30 a.m. The hearing, presided over by Judge Ronald Quidichay, will be held in Dept. 302 is on the third floor of the San Francisco Superior Court building, which is at 400 McAllister Street (cross-street Larkin).
BradBlog reports that the CA-50 lawsuit will be appealed. The case was dismissed when the defendant, Brian Bilbray, moved that the court had no jurisdiction over his election to Congress because Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert had already sworn in Bilbray. Justice and Democracy lovers are refusing to choke this down since Bilbray's swearing in came while outstanding votes awaited counting and the election itself had not yet been certified. Bilbray's motion to dismiss was granted based on Article I, Section 5 of the U.S. Constitution. This same argument has since been applied to keep the courts out of a Republican primary in Nevada.

Another important election-related power grab is in progress here in CA and it has almost slipped under the radar. Assembly bill 2948 has passed both the CA Senate and Assembly and now awaits Arnold's signature. If signed into law, CA would be the first to sign onto a compact being considered by other states. Each participating state agrees that their electoral college votes will be granted to the winner of the national popular vote in future presidential elections. This is meant as a step toward the worthwhile goal of directly electing the president. However, it has the potential impact of overriding the will of the voters in any participating state, and has prompted Dan Ashby of the Election Defense Alliance and California Election Protection Network to call it a "blue state suicide pact." If you think it will help, ask Arnold to veto AB2948. Call 916-445-2841.

Emmy Award winner and Oscar nominee Dorothy Fadiman has a new film opening this week called Stealing America: Vote By Vote. The movie is showing only in select theaters for one night stands beginning at Camp Democracy in DC this Friday. The film will show in Mountain View, CA on 9/19, Oakland, CA on 10/4, and Palo Alto, CA on 10/15. I can't seem to find the dates listed in one place online though I have an e-mail with several more showings. Contact me and I'll send you the list I have.

The movie getting far more attention is ABC's 9/11 docudrama, "The Path To 9/11". There was controversy as soon as the publicity started for this film. It seems obvious that since there are so many unanswered questions about 9/11 that any such theatrical treatment will necessarily be met with less than unanimous acceptance with regard to accuracy, as with election results. Several former members of the Clinton administration were very vocal about misrepresentations--fiction--in this film. Clinton himself wrote a letter to ABC asking them to cancel the movie. Fox News reports that ABC did make changes in response to such pressure. For me, the bottom line here is that this movie is straight up propaganda that serves at least two valuable purposes for the Bush administration.
  1. As an admitted docudrama taking creative license, this film is clearly intended to shape public opinion about what actually happened and who is responsible; this extends beyond the fictional content of the film (which I didn't see) and encompasses all the PR, media hype and controversy that preceded the film's airing.

  2. This film seems to be trying to widen the rift in the perception of reality. This is a central theme in Blueprint For Peaceful Revolution (.pdf). The corporate/military/government/media juggernaut has many ways to divide Americans. One way is leading half the country to believe a lie. There are many ways to sow these seeds of uncertainty, making it impossible to know things for sure. The result is the reality-based community divided from the faith-based community by a rift in the perception of reality. (Faith-based has no religious connotation here, instead it refers to those who would accept the official line unquestioningly, on faith.)
There are a few who have questioned quite eloquently lately. When Rumsfeld was recently in Salt Lake City, he gave a great Black Kettle statement about the rising threat of fascism. That same day, Salt Lake City Mayor Rocky Anderson gave a great outdoor speech condemning this administration (video, transcript). Later that night on MSNBC, Keith Olbermann ripped into Rumsfeld in a new and improved sort of way (video). KO had more worth watching tonight, broadcasting from Ground Zero above what he called this country's unmarked mass grave (video, transcript)

And finally, a note about the ongoing sloppiness at the Eureka Times-Standard. Recall that the T-S recently ran an article comprised of excerpts from a Voter Confidence Committee press release. Five of us from the VCC then submitted a letter to the editor in which we were thankful for the coverage but also critical of a factual error in the story. Beyond anyone's control, the Zogby poll results referenced in our press release were published a day later than expected and the T-S article printed the incorrect survey release date as a result. It is harmless and inconsequential information but it is important because it reinforces the broader point we've been trying to make. That is, don't publish what can't be proven and hasn't been independently verified. So now it turns out that the T-S did publish this letter on 9/3. However, they dropped the names of the other signers and published it with credit only to me. Also, and here comes the kicker...despite their policy, and last year's pen name scandal, and the message we've now delivered repeatedly, I was never contacted to confirm that I really wrote the letter.


Posted by Dave Berman - 10:37 PM | Permalink
Comments (2 So Far) | Top of Page | WDNC Main Page

Read or Post a Comment

The Times-Standard has published at least two letters of mine without contacting me. I say "at least" because I'm not a regular reader and they may have published others that nobody mentioned to me.

However, the Arcata Eye, Eureka Reporter, and even The Lumberjack have all contacted me prior to publication. (The Eureka Reporter even wanted a photo to put with my piece as a guest column.)

Posted by Blogger Kathryn @ Sep 12, 2006, 10:14:00 AM
Permalink to comment | Top of Page | WDNC Main Page

The Diebold case is indeed crucial to the future of America .. we can't let this crooks keep stealing our votes .. thanks for the update! ... Stealing America won't play anywhere my little corner of the world, but I'll definitely check it out on DVD

Posted by Blogger Reel Fanatic @ Sep 12, 2006, 3:27:00 PM
Permalink to comment | Top of Page | WDNC Main Page
<< Home
As shown on
Dave's new blog,
Manifest Positivity

We Do Not Consent, Volume 1 (left) and Volume 2 (right), feature essays from Dave Berman's previous blogs, GuvWurld and We Do Not Consent, respectively. Click the covers for FREE e-book versions (.pdf). As of April 2010, paperbacks are temporarily out of print. Click here for the author's bio.

Back Page Quotes

"Give a damn about the world you live in? Give a damn about what you and I both know is one of the most shameful and destructive periods in American history? If so, do something about it. You can start by reading We Do Not Consent."

— Brad Friedman, Creator/Editor,; Co-Founder,

"If in the future we have vital elections, the "no basis for confidence" formulation that GuvWurld is popularizing will have been a historically important development. This is true because by implicitly insisting on verification and checks and balances instead of faith or trust in elections officials or machines as a basis for legitimacy, it encourages healthy transparent elections. It’s also rare that a political formulation approaches scientific certainty, but this formulation is backed up by scientific principles that teach that if you can’t repeat something (such as an election) and verify it by independent means, it doesn’t exist within the realm of what science will accept as established or proven truth."

— Paul Lehto, Attorney at Law, Everett, WA

"Dave Berman has been candid and confrontational in challenging all of us to be "ruthlessly honest" in answering his question, "What would be better?" He encourages us to build consensus definitions of "better," and to match our words with actions every day, even if we do only "the least we can do." Cumulatively and collectively, our actions will bring truth to light."

— Nezzie Wade, Sociology Professor, Humboldt State University and College of the Redwoods

"Dave Berman's work is quietly brilliant and powerfully utilitarian. His Voter Confidence Resolution provides a fine, flexible tool whereby any community can reclaim and affirm a right relation to its franchise as a community of voters."

— Elizabeth Ferrari, San Francisco, Green Party of California

"This is an important collection of essays with a strong unitary theme: if you can't prove that you were elected, we can't take you seriously as elected officials. Simple, logical, comprehensive. 'Management' (aka, the 'powers that be') needs to get the message. 'The machines' are not legitimizers, they're an artful dodge and a path to deception. We've had enough...and we most certainly DO NOT consent."

— Michael Collins covers the election fraud beat for "Scoop" Independent Media

"What's special about this book (and it fits because there's nothing more fundamental to Democracy than our vote) is the raising of consciousness. Someone recognizing they have no basis for trusting elections may well ask what else is being taken for granted."

— Eddie Ajamian, Los Angeles, CA

"I urge everyone to read "We Do Not Consent", and distribute it as widely as possible."

— B Robert Franza MD, author of We the People ... Have No Clothes: A Pamphlet for every American